Wine Spectator's California Wine Review
The second edition of the most extensive book of California wine reviews ever published. Wine Spectator's California Wine is a definitive guide featuring descriptions and ratings for 5,000 individual California wines -- from widely available bargains to collectible rarities. Includes new tasting notes and in-depth profiles for more than 700 California wineries, along with starred ratings and details on history, vineyards, and specialties. Written by noted California wine expert and Wine Spectator senior editor James Laube.
Read more...
Wine Spectator's California Wine Specifications
He may be employed by the magazine, but James Laube is no mere wine spectator. He's an active participant, as evidenced by Wine Spectator's California Wine, the completely revised second edition of his 1996 James Beard Award winner. Drawing on more than 50,000 personal tasting notes and two decades as a wine writer--most of it as the Spectator's Napa-based correspondent--Laube presents a refreshing reference work ("not a buyers' guide" he insists) to those serious about California wine. California viticulture has seen a lot of changes between editions--vineyards replanted, wineries sold, CEOs turned vintners demanding (and getting) 0-plus for their first bottlings--and the author has tasted pretty much all of it. Introductory chapters provide the reader a nuanced overview of California wine history, grape plantings, wine appellations, vintage evaluations, and even an offbeat fact or two (according to the agricultural commissioner, Mendocino County grapes are its No. 2 cash crop; marijuana is No. 1). But it's chapter 7, with its alphabetical profiles of (almost) every producing winery in the state, that'll be required reading for anyone who's ever worn out their brake linings on the Oakville Grade. Each winery's entry consists of overall quality rating (one to five stars), founding date, current owner, winemaker, acreage, case production, varietals estate-grown and purchased, as well as notes on selected wines. Of course, a few biases show through. Laube doesn't seem to be much of a merlot fan; he tends to be Napacentric; and his vintage ratings by grape type are based on subjective areas (when Laube calls 1995 a five-star year for zinfandel, he means Napa or Sonoma zins; Amador County need not apply). But it's rousing to read his repeated assertion that very, very few California wines are meant to be cellared long-term and that he'd "rather drink a wine a year or two too early than one week too late." --Tony Mason
